Researchers from Oxford University (UK) and the Karolinska Institute (Sweden) used statistical methods to analyse data on all 21,566 men convicted of sexual offences in Sweden between 1973 and 2009.
The researchers looked at the share of sexual offences perpetrated by fathers and brothers of convicted male sex offenders and compared this to the proportion among Swedish men from the general population with similar age and family profiles.
Having a brother convicted of a sexual offence led to five times the risk of a man being convicted of a sexual offence compared to a man whose brother had not been convicted of this type of crime.
Meanwhile, being a father of a man convicted of a sexual offence led to almost four times the risk of being convicted of a sexual offence.
Around 58 per cent of the difference in risk appears linked to 'non-shared' environmental factors (such as perinatal complications, head injuries, childhood sexual victimisation, and peer group attitudes) that affect an individual but are not shared with other family members.
Evidence on the difference in risk between maternal and paternal half-brothers (presumably reared in separate family environments) supports the idea that genetics makes a substantial contribution to increased risk.
"Preventive treatment for families at risk could possibly reduce the number of future victims," Langstrom said.
"We are definitely not saying that we have 'found a gene for sexual offending' or anything of the kind. What we have found is high quality evidence from a large population study that genetic factors have a substantial influence on an increased risk of being convicted of sexual offences," added Professor Seena Fazel of Oxford University's Department of Psychiatry, an author of the paper.
