Sikh student in US drops out of school over bias-based bullying; files lawsuit

A Sikh student in the US state of New Jersey has filed a lawsuit against a Board of Education alleging that he was subjected to bias-based bullying because of his faith and was forced to permanently pull out of school due to the prolonged harassment.

Community-based organisation the Sikh Coalition said it has joined with co-counsel at the Law Offices of Brian M Cige to file a complaint against the Gloucester County Special Services School District Board of Education in Sewell, New Jersey.

The complaint addresses the case of the Sikh student, who remains anonymous as he is a minor, enrolled at the Gloucester County Institute of Technology.

It alleges that the student suffered under a pattern of bias-based bullying since 2018.

No student should experience what my child has gone through -- not the bullying by fellow students, and certainly not the indifference, dismissiveness, or criticism of the adults who are meant to protect them, said the student's mother, who also remains anonymous to protect her child's identity.

I am hopeful that a civil court will recognise this clear case of bullying and take decisive action, both for the sake of my child and to create a safer learning environment for all students in this district.

The Sikh Coalition said in a statement that despite being subjected to slurs based on his actual and perceived race, derogatory comments about his articles of faith, and other bullying and harassment to the point that he were permanently pulled out of school, the student's pleas for help from the school district have been repeatedly brushed aside by educators and administrators.

Prior to the filing of the complaint this month, the Coalition worked with the family to formally appeal the negative finding of the school district's initial investigation.

The organisation said both the first investigation and the appeal ended with the school board refusing to take action; officials ignored the clear pattern of harassment, and insisted on characterising obviously bias-motivated attacks as harmless nicknames.'