Panneerselvam sought to know what was wrong in his government's stand that the meeting, where India and Sri Lanka discussed the matter on January 30, should be held only after the goodwill and rehabilitation efforts of the Maithiripala Sirisena-led government were implemented.
"Neutral observers will accept that such a decision was taken because of our concern for the refugees here," he said.
Quoting the reported remarks of Sri Lankan MP Seenithamby Yogeswaran that the situation in the northeast was not 'conducive' for Tamils to live.
The new government was making efforts to change it and settle them there and then address the refugees issue, the Chief Minister said this echoed his government's stand.
"Our stand is that Tamils living in camps in Sri Lanka should be rehabilitated first and only after that the meeting about repatriation of refugees should have been held," he said in a statement.
Panneerselvam had earlier written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi seeking deferment of the January 30 meeting, saying it was premature since the situation was not conducive for repatriation of Tamil refugees.
Karunanidhi had criticised the move, saying a wonderful opportunity to speak on the status of Sri Lankan Tamils in the light of change of regime in the island nation was lost.
Panneerselvam criticised Karunanidhi on Sri Lankan Tamils issue, saying the previous UPA regime, in which the DMK was a key constituent, had helped Colombo with military equipment and expertise to face the rebel LTTE in ethnic clash that saw heavy Tamil civilian casualties.
He also accused him of enacting a series of 'dramas' for demanding ceasefire such as conducting all-party meeting, holding human chain and holding a 'three hour fast' here, besides other 'eye-wash' activities.
"It is condemnable that Karunanidhi, who has not done anything for the welfare of Sri Lankan Tamils, has issued a statement in favour of the refugees," he said.
The ruling AIADMK has been delivering various welfare measures for Sri Lankan refugees in the state, with his predecessor J Jayalalithaa expanding government schemes to benefit them, he said.
While the Centre had allocated Rs 37.30 crore for them in 2013-14, the state government had spent Rs 111 crore for their welfare, he said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)