State Bar Council suspends 3 lawyers over misconduct

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Feb 24 2016 | 10:42 PM IST
Close on the heels of the conviction of Madurai-based lawyer by the Madras High Court in connection with a contempt of court case, the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry have resolved to suspend three lawyers for their actions which were "unbecoming" of advocates.
With regard to the suspension of practice of Advocate S Sunil Kumar of Avadi, the Council in its order said his actions were "unbecoming" of an advocate and amounted to "professional misconduct," warranting action under Sec 35 of Advocates Act.
The advocate allegedly had in his possession 125 kgs of ganja which he admitted to have brought to hand over to a remand prisoner in Puzhal Jail.He had thrown to winds all the ethics to be maintained by an advocate, the Council observed and suspended him from practicing till the inquiry was over.
Advocate R Muthukrishnan, whom the Council has placed under suspension, in connection with the remarks made by him in the court against the Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul.
The lawyer had alleged that the order delivered by the Chief Justice in connection with a case relating to compulsory helmet wearing rule was a "judicial overreach", demonstrating "unwarranted judicial activism".
After imposing a fine of Rs 10,000 on the advocate, the CJ had referred the matter to the Tamil Nadu Bar Council for appropriate action.
The Council had also suspended Advocate V Antony Jyothi Sheeran of Tiruvallur district for his alleged unruly behavior with a women CISF employee on November 20 last year.
The charge against Sheeran was that he, along with eight other advocates, including Abdul Rahman, RY George Williams and K Muthuramalingam, created a ruckus when a woman CISF personnel frisked a woman lawyer and another personnel in plain clothes and videographed the same.
All the three were prohibited from practicing as lawyers in any court of law, tribunals and other authorities either in their names or in any assumed names, throughout India, pending disposal of the disciplinary proceedings under Advocates Act.
The High Court had yesterday sentenced Madurai-based advocate Peter Ramesh to six months simple imprisonment in a contempt of court case.
However, the HC suspended the sentence for 15 days enabling him to go on appeal.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 24 2016 | 10:42 PM IST

Next Story