Stay on appointment of MPCB chief: SC to hear plea on Jun 19

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 14 2017 | 8:42 PM IST
The Supreme Court today agreed to hear on June 19 a plea filed by the Maharashtra government against the National Green Tribunal's order barring its state pollution control board's head from working.
The green panel on June 8 had stopped the chairpersons of 10 state pollution control boards (SPCBs) from working with immediate effect for not being appointed in consonance with the judgement of the tribunal.
The NGT had ordered chiefs of SPCBs of Maharashtra, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Kerala, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Manipur to stop their functioning.
A vacation bench comprising justices R K Agrawal and Deepak Gupta posted Maharashtra's plea for hearing on Monday after advocate Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, appearing for the state, mentioned the matter before it.
The counsel sought urgent hearing of the plea saying that the recent NGT order has brought the working of the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board to a standstill.
On June 8, the tribunal had slammed the 10 states for making ad-hoc appointments and granted three months to Delhi government and two months to Punjab and Uttar Pradesh for making appointments to their pollution control boards as per the guidelines issued by it.
The NGT had in August last year asked the state governments to fill the vacancies in the boards as per the guidelines laid down by it and file the report.
It had asked them why they should not be directed to stop functioning as chairmen as they were not appointed in consonance with the judgement of the tribunal.
The green panel, which had issued a slew of guidelines for appointments to the posts of chairman and member secretary, had in August said the nominations should be of persons who have "special knowledge, practical experience or qualification in environment protection studies" and not on the ground of their association with state government.
The tribunal said the chairman or member secretary should have a fixed term, which should not be extended. Such persons should not hold office in the board in accordance to their tenure in state government.
The judgement had come on a plea by Uttarakhand resident Rajendra Singh Bhandari, who had challenged the constitution of state pollution control boards on the ground that people who did not qualify were appointed as chairman, member secretary and members of these boards.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 14 2017 | 8:42 PM IST

Next Story