Swiss govt rejects privacy in financial matters

At a time when it is under global pressure, including from India, on black money menace, the Swiss government has rejected the popular initiative to allow strict privacy in financial matters.
The decision also comes at a time when Switzerland is slowly shedding the veil of its famed banking secrecy practices amid global efforts being stepped to curb flow of illicit funds in the financial system.
Emphasising that the consequences for the fight against money laundering and the financing of terrorism depend on how the initiative is interpreted, the Swiss Federal Council today said it was rejecting it.
"The initiative interferes significantly in tax and prosecution procedures and, as a result, would endanger the accurate levying of federal, cantonal and communal taxes.

"In addition, the initiative could have a negative impact on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing," the Council said.
In a statement, the Council said it is "recommending that the popular initiative 'Yes to the protection of privacy' be rejected" and approved the corresponding dispatch for the attention of Parliament.

Switzerland, long known as a place with unbreakable banking secrecy, has come under intense global pressure, including from India, amid worldwide efforts to crack down on illicit fund flows.
The Council today said that protection of privacy against illegal state intervention is an important principle in the rule of law.

"It enjoys constitutional status today in Switzerland and is fleshed out in legislation. There are necessary limits to the protection of privacy in tax law," it noted.
According to the statement, in order for income and wealth taxes to be correctly levied, taxpayers must disclose their income and asset situation to the tax authorities.
"However, privacy continues to be protected as the authorities are bound by tax secrecy and the information received may not be shared, aside from legally defined exceptions," it said.
"The privacy of tax-compliant persons is sufficiently protected thanks to tax secrecy and would therefore not be affected by the initiative.

"However, if a person refuses to cooperate and thereby violates the relationship of trust between citizen and state, the tax authorities should continue to be able to obtain information from third parties," the Council said.
The 'Yes to the protection of privacy' was submitted on September 25, 2014 and came into existence with 117,531 valid signatures.
As per the initiators, protection, in particular of financial privacy, should be enshrined in the Constitution by virtue of the initiative.