"It is hereby directed that no teaching faculty of School Education Department shall take up any activity/assignment including teaching in private institution or coaching centre," said the order issued by the School Education Department.
According to a detailed order issued by the School Education Department, in pursuance of the apex court direction, the Directors of School Education Department Jammu and Kashmir and all Chief Education Officers have been asked to ensure strict compliance of these instructions
The State Government had through a circular in 2005 directed that no official shall undertake any activity & assignment including teaching in a private institution or coaching centre unless permission is obtained from competent authority and that no such permission shall be available two hours before opening of the school and two after the school gets closed.
The writ petition was disposed of by High Court with a direction, "With the above said directions, the writ petition stands disposed of by setting aside part of instructions contained in 2005 circular granting general permission/ authority to officials of Education Department and Medical Education Department to grant permission to all teachers and doctors respectively to engage themselves by way of self-employment in private coaching centres two hours before opening of school and two hours after closing of school and private practice by doctors".
The State Government had, however, filed SLP in Supreme Court against the judgement of the State High Court in 2011.
The Supreme Court in its interim order had passed the direction "in the meantime, the operation of the impugned judgement shall remain stayed".
The apex court has now disposed of the SLP and observed "during the course of the hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State is not aggrieved by directions of the high court in their application to teachers, in so far as the circular of 2005 was set aside. The circular, it has been submitted, was issued by education department and specifically dealt with the issue of whether official engaged in schools could be permitted to take up private assignments".
"It was urged that rules governing private practice by government doctors were not placed before the court. Hence, without considering those rules, the High Court has issued a blanket direction erroneously on the basis that the circular of 2005 also covered services of doctors.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
