The issue was raised in the High Court here this week by lawyers representing the UK government in a challenge to the legality of the Brexit referendum without a Parliament vote.
"Any such changes are a matter for future negotiations, parliamentary scrutiny, and implementation by legislation. The government view at the moment is that it is very likely that any such agreement would be subject to ratification," government lawyer James Eadietold the High Court.
"But as I say, the view within government is that it is very likely that this treaty will be subject to ratification process in the usual way. Most of them are. It is a pretty rare event for the things to take effect immediately upon accession."
Downing Street confirmed that position set out in court was the view of the government.
According to The Guardian, judgment in the legal challenge to Brexit is likely to be reserved and announced only several weeks later.
The losing side is likely to then appeal to the Supreme Court to pursue the challenge.
The case, which opened last week, challenges British Prime Minister Theresa May's right to trigger Article 50 and begin officialBrexitproceedings without a parliamentary vote.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
