Union govt to be made a party in gutkha ban PIL

Image
Press Trust of India Cuttack
Last Updated : Jun 29 2013 | 12:15 AM IST
Orissa High Court today asked the petitioner of a PIL to file an amended petition on the ban on gutkha here making the Central government as a respondent.
"Last year's notification of Odisha government banning use and trade of 'gutkha' did not yield any result because the notification itself was ambiguous and not comprehensive," the petitioner had stated in the court during the hearing.
Voluntary organisation Center for Legal Aid to Poor (CLAP), which had earlier filed a PIL seeking complete ban on all forms of chewing tobacco in the state, blamed it on the Central notification for no result of the Odisha government's one.
In view of the contention of a petitioner that the Odisha government's notification banning production, distribution and sale of gutkha was not comprehensive as it did not cover the flavoured chewing tobacco (zarda) used in 'paan,' the Orissa High Court on the day directed the petitioner to file an amended petition on the matter.
CLAP, which had moved the High Court in December last for a complete ban on consumption and trade in nicotine containing smokeless tobacco, argued in the Court that last year's notification of the state government was evasive and ambiguous as the ban did not cover all forms of chewing tobacco.
However, on such a contention of the petitioner, the state government's counsel pointed out that the notification was issued in the light of an earlier notification issued by the Central government.
"In order to modify the state government notification, a modification of the Central government notice was to be made first," the state government counsel argued.
Adjudicating over the petition, a division bench of the High Court comprising Justices Pradeep K Mohanty and S K Mishra, directed the petitioner to file an amended petition making the Central government as a respondent.
The Bench also asked the state government to file an affidavit stating the details of the amount of gutkha sachets seized in the state after the government notification was issued in December last year and posted the matter to be adjudicated on August 2, informed CLAP counsel Janmejaya Katakiya.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 29 2013 | 12:15 AM IST

Next Story