UPPSC's controversial reservation formula: HC disposes of

Image
Press Trust of India Allahabad
Last Updated : Aug 01 2013 | 7:25 PM IST
The Allahabad High Court today disposed of a writ petition challenging a controversial reservation formula introduced by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (UPPSC).
The proposal was withdrawn last week after violent protests by students and expressions of disapproval by the state government.
A Division Bench comprising Justice Laxmi Kanta Mohapatra and Justice Rakesh Srivastava disposed of the petition filed by Sudhir Kumar Singh and others observing that "no cause of action remains" in the wake of the UPPSC's decision to cancel the results of examinations which were declared on the basis of the controversial reservation formula.
The controversial reservation formula, as per which caste-based quotas were to be introduced at the stage of written tests itself, was implemented while declaring the results of civil services examinations (Mains) on July 4.
The move evoked vehement protests last month from students and resulted in violent agitations in Allahabad, where the UPPSC headquarters is located.
On July 22, the High Court had reserved its judgement on the issue while restraining the UPPSC from holding interviews on the basis of the impugned examination process.
The court had also ticked off the Commission for having shown "haste" in bringing the new formula into force upon being informed that the new system was adopted through voice vote on the very day a proposal to the effect was introduced by a UPPSC member.
Embarrassed over allegations that the move was aimed at providing benefit to a particular caste group considered close to the ruling Samajwadi Party, the state government claimed that the reservation formula was introduced without taking it into confidence.
Subsequently, UPPSC Secretary was removed last week while explanation was asked from its Chairman and the member who had introduced the proposal.
On July 27, the Commission issued a notification announcing that the impugned examination results stood cancelled and "revised results" would be declared "at the earliest".
An affidavit to the effect was submitted before the court earlier this week.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 01 2013 | 7:25 PM IST

Next Story