UPSC exam marks of home secy, ex-fin secy can't be disclosed:

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 19 2016 | 5:48 PM IST
The marks obtained by Home Secretary Rajiv Mehrishi, former Finance Secretary Arvind Mayaram and four other senior 1978-batch IAS officers in the UPSC examination cannot be disclosed as the information is more than 20-years-old, the CIC has held.
An RTI applicant had sought to know the marks obtained by the Home Secretary and former Union Finance Secretary and Rajasthan government officials, including Chief Secretary CS Rajan, Additional Secretary Umrao Salodiya and former Additional Secretaries Vijay Shanker Singh and Ram Lubhaya.
Applicant OP Mehta had sought copies of the marks obtained by the last candidate, in order of merit, belonging to 'General' category, recommended by the UPSC for appointment to the IAS/IFS on the basis of the result of the examination held in 1977.
"The appellant (Mehta) submitted that the respondent has denied information to him on the grounds that the information sought is more than 36-years-old and search/culling out such information would disproportionately divert the scarce resources of the public authority," Information Commissioner Sudhir Bhargava noted in his order.
Mehta had contended that the justification by the UPSC was not justified.
The Commission said that since the information sought is more than 20-years-old, it is exempted from disclosure under Section 8(3) of RTI Act.
The section cited to withhold information is normally applied for three categories -- security of the state, breach of privilege of Parliament or state legislatures and Cabinet papers, including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers.
"Subject to the provisions of clauses (a),(c) and (i) of sub-section (1), any information relating to any occurrence, event or matter which has taken place, occurred or happened twenty years before the date on which any request is made under Section 6 shall be provided to any person making a request under that section:
"Provided that where any question arises as to the date from which the said period of twenty years has to be computed, the decision of the Central Government shall be final, subject to the usual appeals provided for in this Act.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 19 2016 | 5:48 PM IST

Next Story