A bench of Justices P C Ghose and R F Nariman agreed to hear the NDMC's plea on March 22 and asked Tata's Indian Hotels Company Ltd (IHCL), which has challenged a Delhi High Court order allowing auction of the hotel, to file objections, if any, within a week.
The apex court had earlier asked the NDMC to reconsider its decision to auction the five-star hotel in the wake of the Attorney General and Solicitor General's opinion not to initiate any such process.
The bench had also taken note of the fact that there was an internal opinion of top NDMC officials against the auctioning process.
It had told Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain that NDMC had informed the ministry that opinions of the AG and SG favouring extension of lease, were still awaited.
"It is strange and doesn't look bonafide. The AG and SG's opinions should have been placed before the ministry concerned," the bench had said.
To this, the bench had said, "Why are you not agreeing to reconsider the decision. It not a matter of right. Do you not want to be fair to the party who has been paying the rent continuously for 30 years."
IHCL had earlier told the apex court that it was "not clear" why NDMC wanted to auction the prime property which gave the "best revenue" to it.
The company had earlier submitted that NDMC expert report suggests that the council would "lose revenue" if the hotel was auctioned to other players.
hotel should be restrained from taking any fresh bookings, saying "it is very difficult to restrain fresh bookings for a running hotel. Everything will be decided when we hear the matter."
IHCL, which runs the hotel, had on November 8 last year approached the apex court against the Delhi High Court's order that cleared the decks for auctioning of the iconic property.
The firm had challenged the October 27 last year's verdict delivered by a division bench of the high court dismissing IHCL's petition challenging the move by NDMC to auction the property.
IHCL had moved the division bench of the high court against the September 5 last year judgement of a single judge who had not acceded to the firm's request for renewal of licence for a further period, saying it was not entitled for the extension.
The property, owned by NDMC, was given to IHCL on a lease of 33 years. The lease had ended in 2011 and the company was given nine temporary extensions since then on various grounds, with three of them granted last year itself.
IHCL had earlier approached the single judge bench of the high court seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining NDMC from interfering in any manner with the possession, right to operate, run and maintain the hotel premises.
