There is a belief that watching the work of fictional forensic investigators on TV influence viewers.
In the worst case, it is feared, potential criminals will learn how to better conceal a crime from these shows.
In addition, concerns have been expressed that members of juries may have excessive expectations regarding the evidence and as a result are more likely to acquit the accused.
In an experimental study, researchers at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz in Germany found no correlation between watching forensic science TV shows and the ability to get away with committing a crime.
"CSI: Crime Scene Investigation" is a popular US TV series which first hit the small screen in its home country in 2000. It focuses on the characters and the work of a team of forensic crime scene investigators.
The effect named for this series was soon applied to any repercussions that it was held such widely-viewed crime shows had with regard to the general public - including criminals, the police, and potential students of forensic medicine.
"Over many years, it was presumed that certain links in this regard exist, although there were no appropriate studies to prove this," said Andreas Baranowski from Mainz University.
As a first step, the psychologists took a look at statistics from the databases of the FBI and its German equivalent, the Bundeskriminalamt (BKA), and compared the crime detection rates during the years preceding the launch of the CSI series with the subsequent rates.
Then they asked 24 convicted criminals in prisons for their opinions on series such as CSI and whether they thought such shows could help when it came to escaping prosecution.
Researchers completed their series of trials in the form of a fourth test, in which a crime was re-enacted with the help of a doll's house.
On the whole, they did not find any connection between watching forensic dramas and the ability to successfully avoid detection after committing a crime.
However, the male subjects in the fourth part of the experiment performed better than female subjects, and younger subjects better than older subjects while more highly educated subjects did better than less well educated study subjects.
"We can now dispel certain of the myths that have been coursing through the media and other publications for the past 20 years because we are able to state with relative certainty that people who watch CSI are no better at covering their tracks than other people," Baranowski said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
