Jethmalani also hit out at Jaitley alleging that the row over the Delhi government's move to clear his bills for fighting the case has been "instigated" by the Union Finance Minister.
On its part, the AAP alleged that Jaitley was paid large retainership fee for defending a private firm when it was mired in the 2G scam.
The party also sought to defend the government's move to pay Jethmalani from the public exchequer, saying the "penniless" AAP and Kejriwal cannot "afford" expensive lawyers.
"I will certainly defend him even if he can't pay, but he said 'no, I want to pay, send us the bills', so I have sent the bills. Even if the government does not support him, I will.
"If necessary, I will support him for his livelihood because he is a clean force compared to Arun Jaitley," said Jethmalani.
Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia had directed the General Administration Department to clear the bills of Jethmalani. It is learnt that Lt Governor Anil Baijal has sought Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar's advice in doing so.
"If he is unable to pay I will do it for free. I render free services to 90 per cent of my clients," Jethmalani said.
Sisodia said this is not a personal legal battle of Kejriwal and the case is a follow-up of a probe ordered by the Delhi government to clean up corruption in cricket administration in the city.
"The government will fight the case," he told reporters.
In a series of tweets, AAP leader Ashish Khetan, a former journalist, said Jaitley is a "rich man" so he can afford expensive lawyers.
"@narendramodi ji, your FM has made his money defending big ppl involved in big scams. @ArvindKejriwal all his life has defended the poor (sic)," he tweeted.
(REOPENS DEL 14)
Jethmalani alleged the whole episode was "instigated by Arun Jaitley who is afraid of my cross-examination".
The noted lawyer said though he charges from rich clients, majority of his clients are poor.
"I work for them free of cost," he said.
"Everybody knows my normal daily fee is Rs 22.2 lakh or more, perhaps the retainer plus conference charges. You can enquire from anybody. But for 90 per cent of my clients, I do free work," he said.
"And, it was a landmark judgement by the court, when I proved to it that Hindutva is not the name of religion," he said.
He asserted that he has "not received" any money from the Delhi government and expressed his displeasure to media persons for being questioned over the issue.
"It is between the CM and the government. Why are you seeking my opinion? I have not asked him to raise the money for the government. But, if the government, wants to support the CM... It is for the people to object if they do not want to pay it," he said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
