Disposing of a petition filed by Muniammal, whose husband, a retired armyman, went missing in 2013, Justice S Vaidhyanathan said as per a government order, once an employee disappears, the benefit should go to the legal heirs after necessary undertaking was executed including indemnity bond.
Muniammal's husband disappeared on March 9, 2013, and she lodged a complaint the same day. On March 12, 2015, police gave a certificate that the man was not traceable.
In this case the petitioner was entitled to get pension as it was more than two years since her husband went missing.
The judge said the petitioner should be paid terminal benefit payable on account of disappearance of her husband within three months.
She must be paid pension (from March 9, 2013) till March 12, 2015 and then family pension from that date, the court said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
