World writers demand UN charter to curb state surveillance

More than 500 authors, including J M Coetzee and Gunter Grass, have signed a petition to the United Nations published today which claims mass state surveillance is violating basic freedoms.
The signatories called for a new international bill of digital rights to curb what they claimed was the abuse of democracy through widespread Internet snooping.
The letter comes the day after eight leading US-based technology companies called on Washington to overhaul its surveillance laws following the recent revelations of online eavesdropping from fugitive US intelligence leaker Edward Snowden.
The Writers Against Mass Surveillance petition, signed by 562 authors from more than 80 countries, was published in around 30 newspapers worldwide, including The Guardian in Britain.

The signatories were led by five winners of the Nobel Prize in Literature: South African writer Coetzee, German novelist Grass, Austrian playwright Elfriede Jelinek, Swedish poet Tomas Transtroemer and Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk.
It was also signed by Booker Prize winners Margaret Atwood, Julian Barnes, John Berger, Roddy Doyle, Kazuo Ishiguro, Thomas Keneally, Yann Martel, Ian McEwan, Michael Ondaatje and Arundhati Roy.

Others included Peter Hoeg, Colm Toibin, Martin Amis, Lionel Shriver, Louis de Bernieres and Irvine Welsh.
"In recent months, the extent of mass surveillance has become common knowledge," it began.
"With a few clicks of the mouse the state can access your mobile device, your email, your social networking and Internet searches.

"It can follow your political leanings and activities and, in partnership with Internet corporations, it collects and stores your data.
"The basic pillar of democracy is the inviolable integrity of the individual... All humans have the right to remain unobserved and unmolested.
"This fundamental human right has been rendered null and void through abuse of technological developments by states and corporations for mass surveillance purposes.
"A person under surveillance is no longer free; a society under surveillance is no longer a democracy. To maintain any validity, our democratic rights must apply in virtual as in real space."
The writers said mass surveillance treated all citizens as potential suspects.

"Surveillance is theft. This data is not public property: it belongs to us," they said.
They demanded the right for people to determine how their data can be collected and stored, to know how it is being used and demand its deletion if illegally harvested.
"We call on all states and corporations to respect these rights.