Yardstick for judiciary should also apply for ministers: SC

The apex court raised questions on how people with criminal background against whom charges have been framed are made ministers at the Centre and States

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 28 2014 | 5:39 PM IST
The Supreme Court has made it clear that the yardstick followed in appointments in judiciary and civil services of not inducting persons with doubtful integrity should also be applied while appointing minsters.

The apex court raised questions on how people with criminal background against whom charges have been framed are made ministers at the Centre and States.

"Will any reasonably prudent master leave the keys of his chest with a servant whose integrity is doubted?" Justice Kurien Joseph asked.

Also Read

"It may not be altogether irrelevant to note that a person even of doubtful integrity is not appointed in the important organ of the State which interprets law and administers justice, then why to speak of questioned integrity! What to say more, a candidate involved in any criminal case and facing trial, is not appointed in any civil service because of the alleged criminal antecedents, until acquitted," he said.

Justice Kurien was part of five-judge constitution bench which yesterday strongly advised Prime Minister and Chief Ministers not to induct in their ministry people against whom charges have been framed in criminal and corruption cases.

In its judgement, the apex court left it to the wisdom of the PM and CMs not to recommend such names to the President and Governor, observing that nation has reposed faith in them for "good governance".

Writing a separate but concurring judgement, Justice Kurien also said that it is the "prophetic duty" of this Court to remind the key duty holders about their role in the working of the Constitution.

"Hence, I am of the firm view, that the PM and CM of the State, who themselves have taken oath to bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution and to discharge their duties faithfully and conscientiously, will be well advised to consider avoiding any person in the Council of Ministers, against whom charges have been framed by a criminal court in respect of offences involving moral turpitude and also offences specifically referred to in Chapter III of The Representation of the People Act, 1951," he said.

The provision deals with disqualification of membership to Parliament and state legislatures.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 28 2014 | 4:35 PM IST

Next Story