Biocompatibles pleads guilty to misbranding, agrees to pay $ 36 mn
The medical device maker, who has pleaded guilty to misbranding its embolic device LC Bead, will pay the amount to resolve criminal liability and False Claims Act allegations
BS B2B Bureau Washington, USA The Pennsylvania (USA) based medical device manufacturer Biocompatibles Inc, a subsidiary of BTG plc, has pleaded guilty to misbranding its embolic device LC Bead and has agreed to pay more than $ 36 million to resolve criminal and civil liability arising out of its illegal conduct, the Justice Department of the US said yesterday. LC Bead is used to treat liver cancer, among other diseases.
Under the terms of the plea agreement before the US District Court for the District of Columbia, Biocompatibles pleaded guilty to a misdemeanour charge in connection with the company’s misbranding of LC Bead, in violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. LC Bead was cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an embolisation device that can be placed in blood vessels to block or reduce blood flow to certain types of tumours and arteriovenous malformations. LC Bead has never been cleared or approved by FDA as a drug-device combination product or for use as a drug-delivery device or ‘drug-eluting’ bead.
As part of the criminal resolution, Biocompatibles will pay an $8.75 million criminal fine for the misbranding of LC Bead and a criminal forfeiture of $ 2.25 million. The FDA sought assurances in 2004 that Biocompatibles would not use FDA clearance for the device for embolisation to market the device for drug delivery, according to a statement of offense to which the company agreed.
In addition, Biocompatibles will pay $25 million to resolve civil allegations under the False Claims Act that the company caused false claims to be submitted to government healthcare programs for procedures in which LC Bead was loaded with chemotherapy drugs and used as a drug-delivery device. When LC Bead was combined with prescription drugs for use as a drug-eluting bead, it constituted a new combination drug-device product that was not approved or cleared by the FDA and not covered by Medicare and other federal health care programs. The federal share of the civil settlement is approximately $23.6 million, and the state Medicaid share of the civil settlement is approximately $1.4 million.
This settlement illustrates the government’s emphasis on combating health care fraud and marks another achievement for the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT) initiative, which was announced in May 2009 by the Attorney General and the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The partnership between the two departments has focused efforts to reduce and prevent Medicare and Medicaid financial fraud through enhanced cooperation. One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act. Since January 2009, the Justice Department has recovered a total of more than $31.6 billion through False Claims Act cases, with more than $19.2 billion of that amount recovered in cases involving fraud against federal health care programs.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York TimesSubscribeRenews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Complimentary Access to The New York Times

News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Curated Newsletters

Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
Seamless Access Across All Devices