Akbar-Sita lions row: Tripura govt suspends top official after HC verdict

The lion and lioness were named by the Sepahijala Zoological Park in Tripura and sent to Siliguri as part of an animal exchange programme

Asiatic lions, lion
Asiatic lions. Photo: Shutterstock
Nandini Singh New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Feb 26 2024 | 11:41 AM IST
The Tripura government has suspended the state's principal chief conservator of forests (wildlife and ecotourism), Prabin Lal Agrawal, amid a controversy surrounding the naming of a zoo lion and lioness as Akbar and Sita, respectively.

The suspension followed a complaint filed by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) with the Calcutta High Court (HC), alleging that the names hurt religious sentiments.

The animals arrived at the North Bengal Wild Animals Park in Siliguri, North Bengal, from Sepahijala Zoo on February 12.

The animals were named by the Sepahijala Zoological Park in Tripura and were transported to Siliguri as part of an animal exchange programme. The authorities at North Bengal Wild Animals Park were considering renaming the big cats.

Akbar was a prominent Muslim ruler of the Mughal Empire in India. In contrast, Sita, according to the Hindu epic Ramayan, is recognised as the consort of Lord Rama, a significant avatar of the deity Vishnu.

The VHP lodged a petition with the circuit bench, urging for a change in the names as they have offended the religious sentiments of certain individuals.

In a verbal observation, the Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench of the Calcutta High Court stated that the decision to name a lioness and lion "Sita" and "Akbar" should have been avoided to prevent controversy. Questioning if a lion could be named after figures like Swami Vivekananda or Ramakrishna Paramahansa, the bench recommended that the West Bengal Zoo Authority reconsider and rename the two animals.

Justice Bhattacharyya questioned whether it was proper to name animals after deities, mythological figures, freedom fighters, or Nobel laureates, underscoring that such controversies should have been avoided.

"Who has given this name, causing controversy? I was wondering whether any animal can be named after a god, a mythological hero, a freedom fighter, or a Nobel laureate. Can we name a lion after Swami Vivekananda or Ramakrishna? We are not considering the name of a pet dog. Why should you draw controversy by naming a lion and a lioness, Akbar and Sita?" he asked.

Justice Bhattacharya further expressed his disapproval of the names chosen for both animals.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :TripuraLionLionessCalcutta High CourtBS Web Reports

First Published: Feb 26 2024 | 11:41 AM IST

Next Story