Judge in Delhi cash row was named in CBI's 2018 sugar mill fraud case

The CBI had filed an FIR against Simbhaoli Sugar Mills, its directors, and others, including then non-executive director Yashwant Varma, over a complaint by Oriental Bank of Commerce regarding a frau

Yashwant Varma
Yashwant Varma (Photo/X)
Rimjhim Singh New Delhi
4 min read Last Updated : Mar 22 2025 | 11:48 AM IST
Justice Yashwant Varma, a sitting judge of the Delhi High Court embroiled in a cash recovery row, was named in a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) FIR related to a sugar mill bank fraud case from 2018. This development comes after unaccounted cash was reportedly discovered at his Delhi residence.  
 
The CBI had registered an FIR against Simbhaoli Sugar Mills, its directors, and others, including Justice Varma, who was a non-executive director at the time. The case stemmed from a complaint by the Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC), alleging that the sugar mill had defrauded the bank through a fraudulent loan scheme.  
 
As per the complaint, between January and March 2012, OBC’s Hapur branch sanctioned ₹148.59 crore to 5,762 farmers for purchasing agricultural inputs such as fertilisers and seeds. The funds were supposed to be transferred to an escrow account before being credited to the farmers' individual accounts. Simbhaoli Sugar Mills had guaranteed the repayment and was responsible for covering defaults or identity fraud.  
 
The company allegedly misused the loan by submitting falsified Know Your Customer (KYC) documents and diverting the funds. By March 2015, OBC had classified the loan as fraudulent, reporting a loss of ₹97.85 crore, with an outstanding amount of ₹109.08 crore.  
 
Among those named in the FIR was Gurpal Singh, the deputy managing director of the company and son-in-law of former Punjab chief minister Amarinder Singh. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) later initiated a parallel probe into money laundering based on the CBI case.  
 

Court's directive for a fresh probe 

 
In December 2023, the Allahabad High Court ordered the CBI to conduct a fresh investigation into seven banks involved in the loan disbursement. The court remarked that the fraud had "shaken the conscience" of the judiciary.  
 
It was stated that certain bank officials appeared to have colluded with Simbhaoli Sugar Mills in approving loans worth ₹900 crore. Of the involved banks, only OBC approached the Enforcement Directorate, resulting in the seizure of some assets.  
 
In its order, the court said, "Bank officials completely ignored RBI guidelines and circulars. We direct the CBI to investigate which officials approved these loans, which members of the board or credit committee facilitated the disbursements, and which officials allowed the embezzlement to continue unchecked."  
 

CBI's renewed investigation in 2024  

 
Following the Allahabad High Court’s orders, the CBI launched a fresh inquiry in February 2024 to determine why banks continued to lend to Simbhaoli Sugar Mills between 2009 and 2017 despite its loan default history. The probe targeted the company, its directors, and unidentified bank officials.  
 
However, in March 2024, the Supreme Court put a stay on the Allahabad High Court’s directive.  
 

Incident at Justice Varma’s residence  

 
On March 14, a fire broke out in the storeroom of Justice Varma’s official residence in Lutyens’ Delhi. The fire department responded at 11:43 pm and reportedly found cash among burnt jute sacks. A staff member claimed that the damaged materials included court-related documents and stationery.  
 
Since no injuries were reported, no FIR was lodged. However, videos showing the cash were allegedly recorded and forwarded to senior Delhi Police officials, leading to government and judicial intervention. An inquiry was subsequently ordered by the Chief Justice of India (CJI). Reports suggest that the total cash recovered amounted to ₹15 crore.  
 
Following the incident, the Supreme Court Collegium, led by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, decided to transfer Justice Varma back to the Allahabad High Court. The transfer was described as a preliminary measure, with further inquiry still ongoing.  
 
(With agency inputs)
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Delhi High CourtBS Web ReportsCBI

First Published: Mar 22 2025 | 11:48 AM IST

Next Story