Legal experts urge Centre to come up with specific norms for regulating AI

As India aspires to lead in artificial intelligence innovation, legal experts advocate a nuanced, sector-specific regulatory strategy

AI, Artificial Intelligence, Word of the Year, Collins Dictionary
Photo: Freepik
Ashutosh Mishra New Delhi
3 min read Last Updated : Dec 20 2023 | 4:15 PM IST
Last week India took an important step towards regulating artificial intelligence at the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) as 29 countries agreed and signed the Delhi Declaration. The declaration highlighted the need to balance the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence systems with addressing concerns related to misinformation, unemployment, transparency, fairness, protection of intellectual property, and personal data.

While the GPAI is just a declaration, experts are hoping that India, too, like the European Union (EU), will come up with specific standards and regulations for artificial intelligence.

This is of significance as the EU is the only region that has taken actual steps towards regulating artificial intelligence. Experts say that while GPAI takes a more non-binding, principles-based approach, leaving implementation details to individual member countries, the EU's AI Regulation provides a much more detailed regulatory structure, outlining specific rules and restrictions for high-risk artificial intelligence applications.

“India should adopt a balanced approach to regulating artificial intelligence going forward by implementing sector-specific guidelines. A one-size-fits-all approach will not work and will end up stifling innovation,” said Anupam Shukla, Pioneer Legal.

“It will also be important to harmonize our approach to artificial intelligence governance with the rest of the world to avoid creating fragmented and conflicting regulations,” he added.

The GPAI ministers affirmed their commitment to promote collaborative artificial intelligence for a global partnership among GPAI members, emphasising equitable access to critical resources for artificial intelligence research and innovation not only to the member countries but beyond, according to the declaration document.

However, Minister of State for Electronics and Information Technology Rajeev Chandrasekhar has said that the government will soon come out with a policy framework to restrict the use of Indian datasets by countries and platforms that are not trusted.

The EU AI Act takes a pioneering role in artificial intelligence regulation, categorizing risks into unacceptable, high-risk, generative, and limited-risk. It bans threats like cognitive manipulation and facial recognition, assesses high-risk artificial intelligence systems before market entry, requires transparency for Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT), and sets minimal transparency standards for limited-risk artificial intelligence.

The Act also has stringent provisions for violations that may incur penalties up to €30 million or 6% of the violating entity's global income.

“The Government should devise policy to support such innovation with global partnership and resource sharing. Regulation of artificial intelligence is as important as its promotion,” says Astha Sharma, Partner, AQUILAW.

She further says that India can take the example of the EU AI Regulation to enact similar laws to regulate artificial intelligence systems in India.

The EU Act is in a sense, the torchbearer for artificial intelligence regulation, whereas the New Delhi GPAI declaration and the Bletchley declaration aim more towards creating awareness around artificial intelligence regulation, safety, and innovation, says Sharma.

“Even though the declaration is a step forward in artificial intelligence innovation, there is little said about the risks posed by artificial intelligence, such as privacy, safety, bias, etc. The declaration is also silent on the policy measures to mitigate such risks,” she comments on the New Delhi declaration.

As India aspires to lead in artificial intelligence innovation, legal experts advocate a nuanced, sector-specific regulatory strategy. The GPAI New Delhi declaration highlights global collaboration, while insights from the EU's AI Regulation offer perspectives for India's evolving approach, emphasising the imperative of balancing innovation with robust regulation.

The need to balance regulation and innovation should be the focus of India’s artificial intelligence strategy and the EU AI Act can be a good reference point to look at, experts feel.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Artificial intelligenceTechnologylegalEuropean Union

Next Story