Tuesday, November 18, 2025 | 05:58 PM ISTहिंदी में पढें
Business Standard
Notification Icon
userprofile IconSearch

Why the Supreme Court is right to question ECI's voter review in Bihar

The court has correctly stepped in to point out that, under the law as written, a unique ID must be accepted as proof of identity, more so as the ECI plans a countrywide SIR

Supreme Court
premium

The entire SIR project is problematic for the simple reason that establishing citizenship cannot be a special and intensive project prior to a pivotal election.

Business Standard Editorial Comment Mumbai

Listen to This Article

The Supreme Court on Monday effectively reproved the Election Commission of India (ECI) for being excessively stringent in its operation of the “special intensive revision”, or SIR, in Bihar. This process, meant to recreate the electoral roll before the Assembly elections in that state, has become mired in controversy amid concerns about disenfranchisement. The court in July, however, chose not to act on those concerns and allowed the process to go ahead. But it did indicate that some documents — a ration card and the Aadhaar unique ID among them — should be considered as proof of residence by the