The National Green Tribunal had ruled earlier that the project was expanded in an irresponsible manner and quashed the environment clearances. It also imposed Rs 25 crore as penalty. The money deposited at the court’s instance will be utilised for demolition of unauthorised structures and restoration of environment.
The Adani group challenged the NGT ruling in the Supreme Court. The bench, headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur, has issued notices to the ministry of environment and forests (MoEF) and the Gujarat Maritime Board, among others. They will have to reply within four weeks.
AHPPL is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone (APSEZ), which, in a media statement, said: “AHPPL has challenged the order dated 8.1.2016 passed by the National Green Tribunal, Pune, inter alia, cancelling the EC 3.5.2013 for expansion of facilities.”
The company also highlighted that the apex court had allowed port operations to continue as usual, and, hence, there is no impact on port operations. The environment clearance (EC) dated May 3, 2013, issued by the MoEF had permitted construction of liquid cargo storage, which is already completed.
The company said on Thursday, “The court has said we can continue construction activity as per EC dated 26.6.2003, which was anyway not challenged. Thus, there is no impact on further construction as well. Hence, neither our construction nor operations are affected in any manner.”
Senior counsel P Chidambaram tried to show to the judges that the project was going on with every clearance demanded by law. Every authority has filed affidavits affirming clearances.
Ships are docking and 10 miilion liquid cargo is arriving now while the target is 15 million a year.
All equipment prescribed by environment laws are in place and functioning, counsel asserted. However, the chief justice pointed out from the reports that the claim of functional set-up has been doubted by the reports of the monitoring committee.
Chidambaram submitted that more than a thousand workers will be thrown out of construction works, if the project expansion was stopped.
On the other hand, the petitioners, led by Hazira Fishermen Committee, maintain that at least 300 families of the fishermen community in the area would be rendered jobless because of the wanton development.
On the allegation that 500 acres of mangrove have been devastated by the project, Chidambaram stated that replacement has been made. He reiterated that the NGT order was wrong on 20 counts as it had not read the evidence properly.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)