Beware! Your company may be breaching your privacy

Background verification by prospective employees usually flout data protection laws as they are carried out without the consent of candidates

Image via Shutterstock
<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-219931741.html" target="_blank">Image</a> via Shutterstock
BS Web Team Mumbai
Last Updated : May 24 2016 | 11:48 AM IST
As the number of companies in India asking for background checks of their prospective employees keeps increasing, background verification firms say that data protection laws are being flouted, as these checks happen without the consent of the candidate, reported Live Mint.

A number of background verification firms such as HireRight, IDfy AuthBridge, First Advantage India and KPMG India have revealed that there number of firms indulging in background checks, many of whom belong to the lot of newer industries. 

Ajay Trehan, founder of AuthBridge in the report said, “More and more companies want to conduct background checks, but they are not aware of the best practices and are not sensitive to privacy of the candidates.” 

In the begining, background checks in India were relevant mostly to multinational companies, mainly because they followed the practices inculcated by their parent headquaters in other countries. 

In the West, background verification is a regulated process, with laws that govern it. Companies in the US are required to follow Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCA) regulations, which means that candidates need to give employers a written consent to access details about them. The rgulation also requires companies to inform candidates on how they plan on using the information gathered. In India however, that does not seem to be the case, said the report.

The report further reveals that while both blue-collar and white-collar employees can be subject to background checks, the senior-level employees are the ones who are most vulnerable to un-consented verifications. 

Organisations reportedly also conduct probity checks on their prospective employees sans their consent, from time to time, revealed Purushotam Savlani, managing director, First Advantage.

While action for infringement against the right to privacy can be taken only against a state and not against a private company, candidates and employees can still sue for damage if required, said the report.

One however needs to be aware as to what segment of information comes under data protection laws. Court records and criminal records are public information, which do not request prior consent to be accessed. Sensitive and personal information like financial information, medical records etc are protected by the laws.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 24 2016 | 11:34 AM IST

Next Story