Deccan Chronicle moves Hyderabad HC to stop management change

BS Reporter Hyderabad
Last Updated : Nov 16 2014 | 12:08 AM IST
Hyderabad-based Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited (DCHL), which is facing a host of criminal and civil cases filed by the lenders in addition to an ongoing CBI probe into its financial affairs, has approached Hyderabad High Court seeking directions to prohibit the Company Law Board (CLB)'s Principal Bench of New Delhi from proceeding with a case initiated by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO).

The SFIO had filed a petition before the CLB, New Delhi, in September this year asking for a change of management at DCHL, among other actions on grounds that the present management had committed irregularities in conducting the affairs of the company.

On August 25 this year the Ministry of Corporate Affairs had directed the SFIO to file a petition against the DCHL management after an inspection report filed by the serious fraud agency in September, 2013, after it had gone through the books of the media house. The company vice-chairman Vinayak Ravi Reddy in his writ petition argued that the case was filed just on the basis of an inspection report even before a proper investigation was carried out to consider such a serious action like change of the management. The petitioner also argued that the Principal Bench of CLB, New Delhi can not proceed with the SFIO petition as several cases pertaining to the company were already being adjudicated by the Chennai bench.

"So far as the irregularities in conducting the affairs of the company in violation under various sections of the Company Act 1956 is concerned, the same are procedural latches and the same cannot lead to a conclusion that such violations are all prejudicial to the interest of the company or the public interest," the petitioner argued.

That the company had defaulted on loans to the tune of over Rs 4,000 crore owed to various banks and financial institutions had come to light in 2012 when IFCI filed a winding up petition in the AP High Court after the media house promoters failed to repay the debentures on maturity.

Later, Canara Bank had formally filed a complaint with the Central Bureau of Investigation against the promoters of DCHL, including its chairman T Venkattram Reddy alleging the financial irregularities such as mortgaging the same property with multiple lenders, absence of proper accounts pertaining to the loan proceeds among other things.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 15 2014 | 10:39 PM IST

Next Story