Delhi HC restrains entities from infringing on Snapdeal's trademark

The court also directed Go Daddy.com LLC, Endurance Domain Technology LLP, Wild West Domain LLC etc, to suspend infringing domain names during the pendency of the present proceeding

Snapdeal
A private security gurad stands at a gate of Snapdeal headquarters in Gurugram on the outskirts of New Delhi, India. (Photo: Reuters)
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 30 2018 | 1:26 PM IST

The Delhi High Court has restrained various entities from infringing on e-commerce shopping website Snapdeal's trademark.

Justice J R Midha passed the interim order after the counsel for Snapdeal alleged that several persons and entities were misusing the name of the e-commerce marketplace to run fraudulent schemes and dupe customers.

The high court said it was satisfied that ex-parte ad-interim injunction was warranted in this matter and also restrained the defendants from passing off their activities and business as that of the e-commerce giant or affiliated to it till the next date of hearing, on January 8.

It also issued notices to the entities and sought their responses by January 8.

The suit filed by M/s Jasper Infotech Private Limited, which operates Snapdeal, sought that action be taken against those, who were misusing the brand's name to run fraudulent schemes.

The court also directed Go Daddy.com LLC, Endurance Domain Technology LLP, Wild West Domain LLC etc, to suspend infringing domain names during the pendency of the present proceeding.

It also said that the entities' bank accounts, which were used to receive funds, be freezed and directed authorities to send the compliance report before the next date.

According to the plea, scamsters were found to be using the website's name to invoke trust amidst unsuspecting members of the public and inducing them to pay money on the basis of false promises of expensive gifts/ prizes such as Tata Safari and others.

The fraudulent offers were extended through SMS, phone calls, websites and scratch cards, it claimed.

As part of their modus operandi, scamsters were found to be using multiple mobile numbers and bank accounts in a manner intended to make it very difficult for them to be identified without a very coordinated investigation and enforcement by various law enforcement agencies, the plea alleged.

It claimed that offenders have been siphoning off money from unsuspecting general public by illegally using the website's trademark and that it has no involvement or association with any such schemes.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 30 2018 | 10:35 AM IST

Next Story