It also asked the Ministry to facilitate setting up of manufacturing units for equipment required in a steel plant and reduce dependence on imports of such items, which may cost $120 billion, for adding 200 mtpa capacity.
India at present has about 90 mtpa steel production capacity. A high-level committee, headed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, had recently drawn a roadmap for taking the capacity to 300 mtpa by 2025-26.
"The 200 MT increase in steel capacity on incremental basis would require huge capital investments, almost about 200 billion dollars at about $one billion dollar per million tonne capacity," SAIL Chairman C S Verma said.
This massive requirement would entail coming together of banks and financial institutions to pool in their resources and come up with a dedicated body to finance these projects on the similar lines of Power Finance Corporation (PFC), he said speaking at an event here.
"PFC is committed to the integrated development of power and its associated sectors. Therefore, a dedicated financial institution, on the lines of PFC in the power sector, should be floated by the Ministry of Steel," Verma said.
Stating that 60 per cent of the required fund would need to be spent only on sourcing equipment from abroad, he said: "Consequently, steel capacity enhancement of 200 mtpa would translate to outflow of about $120 billion only towards equipment manufacturing or supplies."
"To reduce these costs, it is imperative for the Indian steel industry to give thrust towards setting up of world class equipment manufacturing facilities in India and to promote indigenisation of supplies of mechanical or electrical equipment," he said.
"Facilitation of the Ministry of Steel for setting up steel equipment manufacturing units in India is the need of the hour," Verma said.
Rashtriya Ispat Nigam's Chairman and Managing Director A P Choudhary also spoke on the need of setting up equipment- making units in India. "The number of reputed manufacturers in steel industry is limited, resulting in over-dependence and avoidable delays," he said.
"The solution lies in providing desired impetus to setting up adequate manufacturing facilities in the country, he said.
Choudhary also pitched for allocating captive iron ore mines to the steel industry or creating an policy which would support low-price regime.
"Iron ore mines have to be allotted to the steel producers on captive basis. If captive mines cannot be allocated, an economic policy has to be created, which will support a low price regime for iron ore in the country," he said.
Unless iron ore is available to the industry at cost or at very reasonable prices, steel industry can not be expected to be profitable, Choudhary said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)