Unit economics turning profitable: Foodpanda

The company's average transaction size sits anywhere between Rs 400-600, and says it has been able to charge a 15-25% cut on every transaction from its restaurant partners

Foodpanda says it is profitable on a unit economics basis
Alnoor Peermohamed Bengaluru
Last Updated : Feb 25 2016 | 12:27 AM IST
Online food ordering and delivery service provider Foodpanda India says it now makes a profit on every order, claiming to go against the norm of massive cash burn that the foodtech sector has been plagued with.

With a little over 70,000 daily orders, the Rocket Internet-owned entity says it’s the largest in the segment. The average transaction size is between Rs 400 and Rs 600, and it says it has been able to charge a 15-25 per cent cut on every transaction. “We are profitable on every single order that we do, and we’ve done it over the past year because we’ve focused on customer experience and because we’ve automated 99 per cent of the orders. We also have fantastic customer retention rates,” said Saurabh Kochhar, chief executive officer.

Foodpanda recently dismissed close to 15 per cent of its staff, citing higher automation in its ordering process. It claims 99 per cent of all its orders are without any human intervention, making a chunk of its earlier employees redundant.

Having a presence in close to 200 Indian cities and partnering with about 12,000 restaurants, the company says the scope for expansion in terms of adding inventory is slim. Instead, it will look to go deeper in each of the cities it is present in, with plans to double its 1,200-strong delivery staff over the next year.

“We’re over 2,000 people. Earlier, we were around 2,300,” said Kochhar. “We’re already present in 150-200 cities, so we’re not willing to expand in the next year or so.”

In 2014-15, their loss was Rs 36 crore on revenue of Rs 4.8 crore. Since then, it claims to have grown by 10 times and while still not operationally profitable, it has set a target of 2019 to do that.

The food ordering and delivery space has been one of the worst hit in the recent slump that hit the Indian start-up investment market. Both rivals, Zomato and TinyOwl, have in the recent past dismissed employees to curb cash burn. While at first investors pumped in huge amounts of funding, they later cracked the whip on these companies to reduce the cash drain, fuelled by massive discounting and marketing.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 25 2016 | 12:16 AM IST

Next Story