The financial impact due to understatement of gross revenues stood at at Rs 1,507.25 crore for Reliance Communications, Rs 1,357.68 crore for Tata Teleservices, Airtel -- Rs 1,066.95 crore, Vodafone -- Rs 749.85 crore, Idea -- Rs 423.26 crore and Aircel -- Rs 107.61 crore.
Also, the adjustment of one-time entry fee paid by telecom companies whose licences were quashed by the Supreme Court against the spectrum price they paid in 2012-13 deprived national exchequer of Rs 5,476.3 crore, according to another CAG report.
The CAG reports were tabled today in Parliament.
"Verification of records of six telecom players indicated total understatement of Rs 46,045.75 crore in gross revenue (GR), having corresponding impact of Rs 3,752.37 crore on licence fee (LF) and Rs 1,460.23 crore on spectrum usage charge (SUC). The interest on this short/non-payment of LF and SUC works out to Rs 7,276.33 crore," CAG said in the report on sharing of revenue by private telecom service providers.
It contains significant findings on correctness and completeness of revenue share paid to the government by Bharti Airtel, Vodafone India, Reliance Communications, Idea Cellular, Tata Teleservices and Aircel along with their subsidiaries for the period from 2006-07 to 2009-10.
The audit report on communication and IT sector said, "Set-off of the non-refundable entry fee of Rs 5,476.30 crore paid by licensees in 2008 whose licences were declared illegal and quashed by the Supreme Court against the auction price payable for spectrum in 1800 MHz/800 MHz held in November 2012/March 2013 deprived the government of the revenue to that extent."
The government in 2012 decided to adjust the licence fee paid by companies whose permits were quashed in the 2G case. The adjustment will be provided in the spectrum price those players will shell out in the auction to procure the airwaves.
It also said the government continued to allocate wireless frequencies in spectrum band of 3.3-3.4 Ghz without auction free of cost despite recommendation from regulator Trai in violation of the apex court judgment that said spectrum should be allocated through auction.
CAG added that the continued allocation "administratively, free of cost resulted in significant loss to the public exchequer by way of non-realisation of one-time charges which the government would have realised had they auctioned the spectrum."
"This was despite recommendation of Trai to auction the spectrum in the 3.3-3.4 GHz band, which also violated the intent and spirit of the Supreme Court judgment," the report said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)