Also, one-third of the companies in India have not conducted reviews to assess potential gaps in data integrity, viewed by drug regulators such as US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) as an ultimate standard for the actual quality of a drug made by a company, a survey by the Fraud Investigation and Dispute Services of EY between January and March this year stated.
While import alerts and warning letters issued to some of the companies by the US FDA in recent years had raised questions over the quality standards of generics particularly in the regulated markets, the survey points out that many companies and people within the organisations do not fully understand how to deal with data issues as part of overall improvement in standards.
“Even though 87 per cent respondents signed off their understanding and compliance with GMP norms, 30 per cent of them have received inspection observations from a regulatory body over the last three years. This could raise questions on the effective implementation of GMP norms,” the report, which was launched here on Wednesday, maintained.
The report is based on the responses received from over 170 respondents, mostly comprising senior executives from functions such as business management, quality, legal and compliance.
Speaking on the occasion, Ajaz S Hussain, former deputy director, office of pharmaceutical sciences of the US FDA , and adviser to EY, said focus should be on constantly improving and achieving perfection in the processes and practices associated with the manufacturing of medicines beyond any compliance requirement as human lives are at stake.
According to him, integrity of data is the foundation upon which the decisions on quality, safety and efficacy are made.
Among the other findings, 18 per cent of the respondents said that they do not have adequate staff to witness and review the manufacturing and testing of all the products independently. While 47 per cent of the respondents had whistle blowing policies and mechanisms implemented internally, for reporting any lapses to the senior management, 28 per cent indicated their organisations did not have such frameworks in place.
“This means that while a lot of the stakeholders may genuinely want to help companies by flagging any unethical acts or wrongdoing, the lack of whistle blowing mechanisms offered by the companies could force them to report the potential fraud externally,” the report said while citing an uptick in whistle blowing complaints in India over the past two years.
According to the Central Vigilance Commission, India received close to 450 complaints in just the first half of 2014, while the annual number stood at 698 in 2013.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)