JSPL wins $22.5-mn arbitration against Bolivian firm

In an award dated August 6, 2014, the ICC Tribunal agreed granting principal plus interest for a total in excess of $22.5 million

Image
Press Trust Of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 23 2014 | 11:44 PM IST
Jindal Steel Bolivia, an arm of Jindal Steel and Power, has won in excess of $22.5 million arbitration judgement against state-run mining company Empresa Siderurgica del Mutun (ESM).

"Jindal Steel Bolivia has been vindicated in connection with its investment in the El Mutun project in Bolivia by an international tribunal ordering payment to Jindal of more than $22.5 million by ESM," JSPL said in a statement on Saturday.

Jindal commenced arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) of Paris and sought recovery of USD 18 million principal, plus interest, related to the illegal encashment of the bank guarantees.

Also Read

In an award dated August 6, 2014, the ICC Tribunal agreed granting principal plus interest for a total in excess of $22.5 million, the company said.

JSPL had in 2007 entered into a joint venture pact with Bolivian state, ESM and another state-run firm to develop and exploit El Mutun iron ore mine, having reserves of around 40 billion tonnes of iron ore in eastern Bolivia.

The company also planned to set up a 1.7 million tonne per annum capacity steel plant along with other facilities for backward integration with an investment of $2.1 billion. JSPL said it had invested "tens of millions of dollars" in the project, including providing $18 million in project guarantees.

It said the project was impeded because it never received access to land where the project was to be developed, contrary to the contract. In the statement, Jindal also said that bank guarantees amounting to $18 million were wrongly encashed.

JSPL said Tribunal ruled that there was no entitlement "to encash the guarantees" and "ESM breached, with its encashment, the Contract obligations in respect of Jindal".

"There was 'more than sufficient evidence...to establish that ESM did not comply with the obligation to deliver the lands' and this suspended Jindal's obligations under the Contract," JSPL quoted the Tribunal as saying.

In addition to unlawful encashment in 2010, additional actions by Bolivia and its entities undermined the El Mutún project and forced the termination of the project contract, it said.

"Jindal has commenced a second ICC arbitration related to the project, focused among other things on damages arising out of the termination of the Mutún contract. Jindal is seeking damages approaching approximately $100 million. The case is pending. Jindal instructed the international lawyers of White & Case for both arbitrations," JSPL said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 23 2014 | 10:47 PM IST

Next Story