McDonald's case: NCLAT to study London court order before further decision

Bakshi, the estranged MIPL partner, declined comment on the matter, saying he was awaiting the signed order

McD, McDonald's
Veena Mani New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 22 2017 | 1:49 AM IST
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on Thursday said it would study London Court of International Arbitration’s (LCIA’s) order, passed last week, before arriving at a decision on the ongoing dispute between McDonald’s India Pvt Ltd (MIPL) and Vikram Bakshi.

The matter will be heard on October 25, NCLAT Chairman Justice S J Mukhopadhaya said. It was important to understand whether the issue between the two joint venture (JV) partners was a case of operational mismanagement or an arbitral dispute, he added. Bakshi and MIPL have a 50:50 JV in India for the North and East regions.

“We have to see if it is an operational mismanagement or arbitral dispute. The jurisdiction (of the NCLAT) would depend on that,” Justice Mukhopadhaya said.

Bakshi, the estranged MIPL partner, declined comment on the matter, saying he was awaiting the signed order.

MIPL stated it was reviewing the direction from the court.

The LCIA on September 13 had asked Bakshi to sell his stake in the JV company, Connaught Plaza Restaurants Ltd (CPRL), to the US-based fast-food chain after it upheld the latter’s position.

McDonald’s Corporation, the parent of MIPL, had moved the LCIA in December 2013 following a breakdown in ties between the two partners in July-August 2013. The LCIA matter pertained to the valuation of Bakshi’s holding in CRPL by McDonald’s, which the former had said was lower than what it actually was.

Bakshi had proposed to buy out McDonald’s stake in the 50:50 joint venture minus the brand, after he spurned the fast-food chain’s offer to buy out his stake for $7 million (Rs 41 crore) in 2008. He hired independent audit firm Grant Thornton to value CPRL. The audit firm arrived at a valuation of $331 million (Rs 1,755 crore), which was rejected by McDonald’s.

On Wednesday, the National Company Law Tribunal had postponed the hearing pertaining to the show-cause notice issued to MIPL by it for contempt of court. MIPL was slated to respond to the notice, which will now be taken up on Tuesday. 


One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story