Besides, a decision on appointing a third-party expert to look into the reason for a decline in production will be taken by the arbitrators.
“A decision on the fresh penalty would be taken by the arbitrators. However, till the arbitration process gets over, part of cost recovery from KG-D6 would be disallowed every year for the company,” a senior petroleum ministry official told Business Standard.
| REELING |
|
The arbitration process in this regard is stuck over appointment of the third member in the three-member panel of arbitrators. RIL and the government had, respectively, nominated former chief justices S P Bharucha and V N Khare, but the two sides were divided on whether or not the third arbitrator should be a foreigner.
The Supreme Court is to hear a case on this on January 7 next year.
Meanwhile, the ministry has moved a Cabinet note to allow RIL to raise the price of gas produced from its D1 and D3 fields by furnishing a bank guarantee. “This guarantee will be encashed if it is proved there was a deliberate hoarding of gas from D1 and D3 fields. However, the amount of this bank guarantee has not yet been finalised,” the official added. There were reports the company might be asked to furnish a guarantee of $135 million every quarter.
Earlier, there was a plan to cap the gas price for the firm at the current $4.2 a million British thermal unit (mBtu), but the Cabinet note proposes to allow the company to double the rate to $8.4 per mBtu from April 2014. Over the past four years, the total shortfall in production from the KG-D6 block has reached 154 million standard cubic metres per day (mscmd). While the production shortfall in 2010-11 stood at around 5 mscmd, it rose over the following years to 28 mscmd (2011-12), 55 mscmd (2012-13) and 66 mscmd (2013-14).
The total output estimate for the RIL blocks has come down from 10 trillion cubic feet (tcf) to 3.5 tcf. In July this year, the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons had recommended the additional fine on the company.
The company had earlier said the fall in production was due to a “substantial variance in reservoir behaviour and character being observed vis-à-vis the prediction. And, there seem to be reservoir constraints in achieving the gas production rates”.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)