Sort out Bhushan Power and Steel asset issue: NCLAT to MCA and ED

Appellate tribunal says ED can claim dues from proceeds of crime under IBC as operational creditor

NCLAT's nod to Sterling Biotech for settlement with lenders baffles experts
Representative Image
Aashish Aryan New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Oct 25 2019 | 11:18 PM IST
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on Friday asked the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) and the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) to sort out whether the assets of Bhushan Power and Steel (BPSL), allegedly purchased from proceeds of crime, can be attached during the insolvency period.

The MCA had, in an affidavit to the NCLAT, said the ED had no rights to attach the properties of a corporate debtor and that doing it would hamper the corporate insolvency resolution process of companies.

Based on these submissions, the NCLAT had asked the ED to forthwith release to the custody of the resolution professional the attached assets of BPSL.

Later, the ED had taken a divergent view and said that the NCLAT couldn't ask it to release the attached assets as the proceedings were going on under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The ED, a three-member Bench headed by NCLAT Chairperson Justice S J Mukhopadhaya, said it could claim its dues, which is from the proceeds of crime, under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) as an operational creditor. The matter will be next heard on November 18.

“The amount generated would be under the operational debt and the ED can claim this. Sell it and give it to the creditors. Whatever you are entitled, you would get it. There is no question of amendment of law,” the NCLAT said.

During the last hearing on October 14, the appellate tribunal had directed the ED to release the attached properties of BPSL and asked it to not attach any further assets without its permission. The NCLAT also slammed ED, saying that the IBC would fail if the agency functions like this. It had then directed it to file a reply within two days, and it was in the same reply that ED had opposed NCLAT’s jurisdiction.

The ED had seized a portion of BPSL assets in the money laundering case against its former promoters. On September 5, the NCLT had approved JSW Steel’s Rs 19,700-crore resolution plan for BPSL. JSW Steel then approached the NCLAT seeking protection from the ongoing investigation in money laundering cases against former promoters of BPSL as the NCLT judgment was silent on the same.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Enforcement DirectorateMCAInsolvency and Bankruptcy CodeMinistry of Corporate AffairsPMLANCLAT

Next Story