NCLAT rejects Dalmia Bharat's plea for status quo on bids for Binani Cement

The appellate tribunal said the final outcome of the bids to maximise the value would be subject to the outcome of the Dalmiya's petition filed before it

Binani cement
The UltraTech-backed Binani Cement’s offer is ~7 billion more than the Dalmia Bharat Cement-led consortium’s plan selected by creditors
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 22 2018 | 6:43 PM IST

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on Tuesday declined to order a status quo on the bids to maximise the offer for debt-ridden Binani Cement by the two resolution applicants UltraTech Cement and Dalmia Bharat group.

The appellate tribunal said the final outcome of the bids to maximise the value would be subject to the outcome of the Dalmiya's petition filed before it.

"In the pendency of the order... interim orders passed earlier will continue," said an NCLAT bench headed by Chairman Justice S J Mukhopadhaya.

The NCLAT has listed the matter for next hearing on July 10.

The appellate tribunal was hearing a batch of petitions filed against the Kolkata bench of the NCLT, which had declined to approve the bids of Dalmia Bharat group's Rajputana Properties for Binani Cement.

The NCLT had asked to consider the bid of Aditya Birla group firm UltraTech, which was around Rs 11 billion higher. It had also given Dalmia Bharat an opportunity to match it up.

During the proceedings, senior advocate Gopal Subramanium appearing for Dalmia Bharat said UltraTech was ineligible under section 29 A to bid for Binani Cement under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code.

However, this was opposed by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi appearing for UltraTech.

"There is no ground to term us as ineligible. Rajputana is asking for grounds to oust us because they can not oust us on money," he said.

Rohatgi further said Ultratech had put forth a bid of Rs 76 billion, which was Rs 11 billion more than Rajputana's.

Subramanium said Rajputana Properties is being asked to match the offer.

"We are being pressed by the CoC (to match the offer)," he said requesting the tribunal to grant status quo on process till the next hearing.

However, the NCLAT declined to stay and directed all the parties to file a written submission why they are eligible and the other party is not.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 22 2018 | 6:42 PM IST

Next Story