"Here is a case where only one Resolution Plan was found to be in conformity with the provisions of the Code and CIRP Regulations...Though it was rejected, yet, Resolution Applicant/TEPL re-submitted the plan to the resolution professional (RP) for placing before the CoC. However, CoC could not take a decision either way on the revised resolution plan due to lack of sufficient time. Therefore, it is a fit case to exclude the period during which the Resolution Plan was being submitted from time to time," the judge stated in a written order uploaded on the NCLT website later in the day.