Plea against Odisha project filed late: Posco to NGT

Posco contended that forest clearance for its project was granted in 2009 while it has been challenged in 2013

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 02 2013 | 5:49 PM IST
South Korean major Posco today claimed before National Green Tribunal that a plea challenging the forest clearance to its Rs 51,000-crore mega steel project in Odisha was not maintainable as it has been filed late and the issue has already been decided by Supreme Court in 2008.

The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) also agreed with Posco's contention on its project in Jagatsinghpur district, saying the petitioner was aware for the last three years that trees were being cut, but it approached the tribunal only in 2013.

Refuting Posco and MoEF's contentions, senior advocate Raj Panjwani, appearing for petitioner Prafulla Samantara, argued that the steel major had not been granted forest clearance under the Indian Forest Act, and thus it cannot be considered as valid.

Posco India Pvt Ltd contended before a bench headed by Tribunal (NGT) Chairperson Justice Swatanter Kumar that the forest clearance (FC) for its project was granted in 2009 while it has been challenged in 2013 by the petitioner.

"The petition is not maintainable as it is barred by time. Furthermore, the matter has been concluded before the Supreme Court. This issue cannot be re-agitated before this tribunal now," senior advocate Pinaki Mishra, appearing for Posco, contended.

A special environmental bench of the apex court in August 2008 had allowed Posco to go ahead with its plans and had also cleared forest diversion proposal for the plant site which required over 1253 hectares of forest land.

Pajwani contented that without proper forest clearance as well as environment clearance (EC), Posco "cannot touch a single tree". He argued that as per environmental guidelines, EC can only be granted after FC is given.

He said that at present Posco has no environment clearance for its two linked projects- the steel plant and the captive minor port- and the forest clearance is not valid, hence it cannot cut trees.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 02 2013 | 5:40 PM IST

Next Story