PTC moves SC against Jaypee group on power purchasing pact

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 1:18 AM IST

State-owned Power Trading Corporation (PTC) today moved the Supreme Court requesting it to restrain Jaypee group from selling power from its Rs 7,000 crore Karamcha Hydel Power project to other firms.

PTC has challenged the orders of the Delhi High Court, which refused to restrain Jaypee Karcham Hydro Corporation (JKHC) from signing agreements with other power distributing firms.

Admitting the plea, a bench comprising Justices Altamas Kabir and A K Patnaik issued notices to JKHC and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) directing them to file replies within three weeks.

The bench said that if they find any third party agreement by JKHC, then it would the subject to the outcome of the PTC's petition. The Apex court would hear the matter on December 7, 2010.

According to PTC, it had entered into a power purchase agreement (PPA) with the Jaypee group in March 2006 for drawing 704 Mw of the installed capacity.

Based on the PPA, PTC entered into agreement for sale of power from Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan, the PSU submitted.

The dispute started after JKHC approached CERC in July 2009 for fixation of tariff, taking into account the project cost of Rs 7,080 crore.

However, CERC said that under the provisions, it could fix the tariff only six months prior to commercial operations of the project. The JKHC project is to be operational from November, 2011.

In the light of CERC's refusal to fix the tariff, PTC sought a meeting with Jaypee to discuss the PPA.

JKHC, however, said that their PPA was void, and it has the right to determine the tariff.

"Declaration of the PPA as void is in utter disregard to the provision of the agreement and the regulations of CERC and therefrom it was illegal and bad in law," said PTC in its petition.

PTC approached High Court in January 2010 seeking stay on JKHC from entering into agreement with third parties. However, the court declined PTC's plea.

It was later challenged by PTC before a division bench of the Court, but on August 13, 2010 it also upheld the earlier decision.

Meanwhile, JKHC and PTC has also appointed arbitrators to resolve the issue.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 21 2010 | 9:06 PM IST

Next Story