The idea is to quickly address adverse effects of new launches. The proposed monitoring cells would also keep a watch on withdrawal of drugs in developed countries and suggest similar moves for the domestic market.
“A strong pharmaco-vigilance system is required to ensure the continuous monitoring and evaluation of the new safety data generated under the real-world conditions on the effects, side-effects, contraindications, drug interactions, new indications and use in new populations of all drugs,” a proposal from the drug regulator’s office, reviewed by Business Standard, said. The proposal has been submitted to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare for consideration.
Though many leading drug makers monitor post marketing data for their key products, at present there are no provisions under the law for companies to mandatorily have any such cell and record data for adverse effects of a product after its launch.
According to the proposal, the cells may be headed by “qualified medical personnel capable of monitoring the safety of the marketed products”. The note also points out that for assessing risk-benefit profile of a medicine, the Indian regulatory system was so far primarily dependent on the moves in the regulated and developed markets such as the US, Europe and Japan, where drugs were launched much before they were in India.
However, in recent years, while many domestic companies have started investing in R&D to develop new drugs on their own, the time lag in launch of a drug in India as compared to developed markets has reduced considerably. “As a result, for such drugs the long-term safety data is not available at the time of their marketing in India,” the proposal said.
The regulator has also raised concerns regarding reportage of adverse effects in the country. There were instances in the past when drugs were banned and withdrawn in other countries due to safety issues, but continued to be marketed in India because of lack of adequate data.
Regulatory experts view the proposed move as an immediate necessity towards better regulation. However, some also emphasise on the need for the regulator itself to monitor such data as companies alone cannot be trusted with the same.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app