SAT directs Sebi to pass fresh order in RIL's Network18 buy

Sebi did not pass an order in the matter but conveyed its decision to SAT through a signed affidavit

Sebi
Sebi. (Photo: Kamlesh Pednekar)
BS Reporter Mumbai
Last Updated : Jun 23 2018 | 2:29 AM IST
The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has directed the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) to conduct a fresh probe into the acquisition of Network18 Media & Investments by Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) through its subsidiary Independent Media Trust (IMT).

In a 19-page order released on Friday, the tribunal pulled up Sebi for not following the instructions it gave on this in an order dated April 13, 2016.

The issue is whether RIL violated the listing norms while taking control of Network18. 

Petitioners have alleged that RIL took indirect control of Network18 by subscribing to the so-called zero coupon, optionally and fully convertible debentures (ZOCDs), on February 27, 2012. It has been alleged that RIL delayed disclosing this to shareholders.

The tribunal took up the issue two years ago, when it passed an order asking Sebi to do a fresh probe.


“While considering the approval given by Sebi to the open offer price of NW18 (Network18), it was noticed that the open offer price was based on the clauses contained in the ZOCD Agreement dated February 27, 2012. Accordingly, this tribunal perused the clauses contained in the ZOCD agreement and arrived at a prima facie conclusion that on execution of the ZOCD Agreement, control over NW18 indirectly stood divested in favour of IMT,” said Justice J P Devadhar in the order.

Accordingly, SAT asked Sebi to conduct a fresh probe and pass an order it. However, Sebi had rejected the plea of the petitioners on the grounds that the transaction did not contribute to a violation in the listing norms since the IMT was not a material subsidiary of RIL. Sebi did not pass an order in the matter but conveyed its decision to SAT through a signed affidavit.

“Sustaining such patently erroneous decision of Sebi would be detrimental to the interests of investors in the securities market and would encourage listed companies to acquire indirect control over other companies through a Trust or some other entity without making disclosures under Clause 36 of the Listing Agreement,” SAT noted.


One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story