The Supreme Court today admitted Tata group's plea against the government's decision to allow Reliance Power (RPower) to use coal mined from blocks allotted to Sasan Power for other projects, but Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (ADAG) company said it is going ahead with implementation of its projects as per schedule.
ADAG said in a statement that the apex court had not stayed or passed any interim order against the Sasan project and RPower is proceeding ahead with the implementation of its projects as per schedule.
A bench of Justice GS Singhvi and Justice HL Dattu admitted the petition of Tata group company Tata Power and posted the matter for hearing in February next year.
"Let them be considered in detail," said the bench while admitting the Tata Power plea.
Tata Power has challenged the Centre's decision to allow RPower to use coal minded from blocks alloted to the Rs 20,000-crore Sasan Power Project for other power projects. It has accused the government of favouritism in taking such a decision.
"RPower’s 8,000 Mw of power projects in Madhya Pradesh are on schedule. There is no stay or any interim order passed by the Honourable Supreme Court in this regard.... RPower is proceeding ahead with the implementation of its projects as per schedule," the company statement said.
In November 2010, the apex court had issued notices to the Centre, the Ministry of Power, the Ministry of Coal, RPower, Power Trading Corporation on Tata Power's plea.
Tata Power has challenged the decision by the Empowered Group of Ministers to allow RPower to use excess coal from the captive mines meant for the Sasan project in Madhya Pradesh for another 4,000 Mw project at Chitrangi in the same state.
In August 2010, the government in an affidavit had said Tata's petition was "misleading and erroneous".
It had questioned the locus standi of Tata Power, saying, "The petitioner cannot allege violation of any legal right vis-a-vis tender process, as it waived its right by not extending the bid.
However, Tata Power had refuted these allegations in its rejoinder and submitted that bidding process for Sasan UMPP was never meant or intended to vest the successful bidder to extra coal supply of 9 million tonne per annum, which could be used for developing other power projects.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
