SC stays further proceedings in Amazon-Future-Reliance case before Delhi HC

A Bench headed by Justice Rohinton F Nariman said the matter will be finally decided by the apex court. The matter will be heard on May 4

SUPREME COURT
ANI
2 min read Last Updated : Apr 19 2021 | 1:59 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

The Supreme Court on Monday stayed further proceedings before Single Judge and Division Bench of Delhi High Court in the Amazon-Future-Reliance case.

A Bench headed by Justice Rohinton F Nariman said the matter will be finally decided by the top court. The matter will be heard on May 4.

"We will stay further proceedings before Single Judge and Division Bench. Meanwhile, pleadings will be completed and the matter will come up with other matter on May 4," the apex court said.

The top court was hearing an appeal of e-commerce giant Amazon challenging Delhi High Court's decision to stay an order upholding an emergency arbitrator award restraining Future Retail Limited (FRL) from going ahead with its Rs 24,731 crore assets sale deal with Reliance Retail.

On March 22, a Division Bench of High Court Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Jasmeet Singh had stayed a March 18 order of Justice J R Midha ordering attachment of the assets of Future Coupons Private Limited (FCPL), FRL, Kishore Biyani and 10 others promoters.

Amazon has been seeking enforcement of an order of the emergency arbitrator (EA) at the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) restraining FRL from taking any steps to transfer its retail assets.

Amazon has a 49 per cent stake in FCPL, which in turn owns a 9.82 per cent stake in FRL. Amazon's contention is that it has invested Rs 1,431 crore in FCPL on the clear understanding that FRL would be the sole vehicle for its retail business and its retail assets would not be alienated without consent and never to a Restricted Person.

FRL, on the other hand, has objected to the enforcement of the EA award saying that it is not an order under Section 17(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and hence not enforceable in India.

FRL has contended that the Rs 24,731 crore deal was very important to save its 25,000 employees. It had said as per the deal, Reliance will not only take over FRL's shops but also all its liabilities.

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Supreme CourtFuture Retail

First Published: Apr 19 2021 | 1:50 PM IST

Next Story