Sebi breather for Pyramid Saimira founder

Image
T E Narasimhan Chennai
Last Updated : Jan 21 2013 | 12:40 AM IST

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on Monday disposed proceedings against Usha Saminathan, one of the promoters of Pyramid Saimira Theatre Ltd (PSTL). The regulator had issued the order in a case relates to allocation of warrants worth Rs 41.43 crore to Usha, wife of the company’s promoter director P S Saminathan.

Sebi probed the case after it was observed that PSTL, in a meeting of its board of directors on October 22, 2007, allotted 36,40,000 convertible warrants to P S Saminathan on preferential basis, at a price of Rs 310 per warrant.

The warrants were to expire on April 21, 2009. It was observed that on March 5 that year, Saminathan transferred warrants in favour of Uma. As another promoter of PSTL, she opted to convert 14,85,000 warrants into equity shares. Accordingly, on April 11, 2009, PSTL allotted 14,85,000 shares on conversion of warrants at Rs 310 per share. The amount payable to the PSTL for the exercise of these warrants was Rs 41,43,15,000.

Investigation concluded that the amount towards conversion of these warrants was received from various other third parties -- much beforethe actual date, when Usha opted to convert the warrants.

It was alleged that she did not pay the amount to PSTL for the conversion of warrants, and failed to pay the above consideration to PSTL for the conversion of warrants.

Sebi thus appointed Barnali Mukherjee as adjudicating officer to investigate the case.

On Monday, the officer said in his order that Rs 41.43 crore payable by Usha Saminathan, was received prior to the date of allotment. Further the auditor of the company vide certificate dated April 9, 2009 confirmed that PSTL received on various dates ranging from February 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009 the balance amount of application money amounting to Rs 41,43,15,000 towards allotment of 14,85,000 equity shares on conversion of equal number of share warrants.

“Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find the instant matter fit for imposition of penalty in terms of Section 15HB of the SEBI Act, 1992 and dispose of the proceedings accordingly,” said in the order.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 04 2011 | 12:22 AM IST

Next Story