Tata plea against coal diversion by R-Power misleading: Govt

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 21 2013 | 4:14 AM IST

Rejecting the allegation that it favoured ADAG group firm Reliance Power for usage of coal from mines alloted to the Rs 20,000 crore Sasan Power Project, the government has asked the Supreme Court to reject the petition of Tata Power as "misleading and erroneous".

It also questioned the locus standi of Tata Power, saying, "The petitioner cannot allege violation of any legal right vis-a-vis tender process, as it waived its right by not extending the bid."

In an affidavit filed before the apex court, the government said that the petition challenging the use of coal for projects other than 4,000-MW Sasan Ultra-Mega Power Project (UMPP) was filed on a totally false basis and "gives a totally misleading and erroneous impression".

The Tata petition is scheduled to be heard by the apex court on August 25.

Tata Power is challenging the decision of an Empowered Group of Minister (EGoM) which had allowed R-Power to use excess coal from the captive mines meant for the Sasan project in Madhya Pradesh for another 4,000-MW project at Chitrangi, in the same state.

The government further submitted in its petition that Tata has given no explanation why it did not extend its bid.

"The petitioner did not respond in absence of any specific reasons of doing so," said the government in its 16-page-long affidavit.

On the allegation that Tata was not informed that the coal of the Sasan UMPP would be allowed to be used for another power project, the government said that it had informed all the bidders of the project.

"The communication dated May 25, 2007, was sent to all bidders for extension of the bids and it was mandatory condition that the bids had to be extended... The bidding process was still in progress and the petitioner was required to extend the bid to continue to participate in the process," the government said.

It further submitted that two bidders, Tata and Jindal Steel and Power, had not responded to its letter and opted out of the process.

"Accordingly, the bid of the petitioner (Tata) was invalidated and it was no longer a part of the bidding process," the government said.

The government further said that it took a decision on diversion of coal only after the Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh wrote a letter to the Prime Minister on November 2, 2007, pointing out excess availability of coal at the Sasan UMPP and requested using some of it in the Chitrangi power project alloted to R-Power.

This letter was forwarded to the EGoM, which after due consultation with the Ministry of Coal and other nodal agencies, allowed it.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 11 2010 | 6:40 PM IST

Next Story