The offer was made by UltraTech in an email to the resolution professional on Thursday, after the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Kolkata heard UltraTech’s petition against resolution professional (RP) Vijaykumar Iyer of Deloitte for rejecting its earlier offer, sources added. The tribunal has asked the resolution professional to respond to UltraTech's petition and the matter is posted for hearing on March 19.
The resolution professional and the committee of creditors had earlier selected Dalmia Bharat Cement’s Rs 63 billion offer, which included an offer to repay all secured lenders and one unsecured lender, IDBI Bank. This was because only IDBI Bank had the voting power among all the unsecured creditors of Binani Cement, sources said.
The Dalmia Bharat offer “squeezed out” the rest of the non-financial bidders despite the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) being clear that the interest of all stakeholders should be balanced, they added.
With its latest offer, UltraTech will pay 100 per cent dues of all lenders, both secured and unsecured, as compared to a 70 per cent offer made to non-financial creditors earlier. The support of unsecured creditors, mostly small and medium enterprises, is necessary to keep Binani Cement running.
A Deloitte spokesperson declined to comment on the issue citing client confidentiality. A Dalmia Bharat spokesperson said the company will not comment on the Binani Cement acquisition at present.
Binani Industries, the promoter of Binani Cement, has already challenged the resolution professional in the tribunal, saying the resolution professional has “personal interest” in undervaluing Binani Cement and then selling it to a preferred bidder. According to Binani Industries, the value of Binani Cement is Rs 173 billion. The Binani petition will be heard on Friday.
Industry sources said the haste showed by the committee of creditors and the resolution professional in preferring a particular party needed to be investigated and all the details of how the weightage was assigned should be made public. “This process is flawed and non-transparent. The entire process needs to be probed… on what basis they dropped the JSW offer, called for bids again and then ignored the offer from a credit worthy company,” a source close to the development said.
Interestingly, in the first round of bidding for Binani Cement, JSW Cement had emerged as the highest bidder. But its offer was rejected and another round of bids was called. Six companies, including UltraTech, Dalmia Cement, stock broker Rakesh Jhunjhunwala, Heidelberg Cement, Ramco Cement, and JSW Cement, participated.
Bank of Baroda had moved NCLT Kolkata last July after the company failed to repay Rs 39.7 billion debt. Binani Cement has a production capacity of 11 million tonnes per annum (MTPA). UltraTech has also sought the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI’s) approval for the acquisition of Binani Cement.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)