WhatsApp not indulging in predatory pricing, says CCI after complaint

It was alleged that WhatsApp is indulging in predatory pricing by not charging any subscription fee

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 02 2017 | 11:52 AM IST
There is "no substance" in the allegations of predatory pricing made against WhatsApp even though the messaging app is dominant in the relevant Indian market, according to Competition Commission of India (CCI).

WhatsApp Inc was acquired by Facebook in 2014.

Rejecting a complaint, CCI on Thursday emphasised that there are no significant costs preventing the users to switch from one consumer communication application to another.

Among other things, it was alleged that WhatsApp is indulging in predatory pricing by not charging any subscription fee from the users since January last year.

To assess the complaint, the fair trade regulator considered 'the market for instant messaging services using consumer communication apps through smartphones in India' as the relevant one.

"... The Commission is of the view that even though 'WhatsApp' appears to be dominant in the relevant market, the allegations of predatory pricing have no substance and the opposite party has not contravened any of the provisions of Section 4 of the (Competition) Act," the regulator said in it order.

Section 4 pertains to abuse of dominant position.

According to the watchdog, all consumer communication apps are offered free of cost or at a very low price and are normally characterised by simple user interfaces so that costs of switching to a new app are minimal for consumers.

"Furthermore, the expansion of Hike Messenger to nearly 100 million user base within three years of launching their services into the aforesaid market reflects that in this market, there are no significant barriers to entry and consumers appear to be price sensitive," the order said.

Besides, CCI said that allegations of WhatsApp breaching the Information Technology Act, 2000, do not fall within the purview of examination under the provisions of the Competition Act.

The complaint was filed by Rajasthan-based chartered accountant Vinod Kumar Gupta on behalf of Fight for Transparency Society.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 02 2017 | 11:52 AM IST

Next Story