Believers' faith proves Ram was born in disputed land in Ayodhya, SC told

The response came on a question by the SC, which wanted to know if the parties had any revenue records to show that the land or the disputed property belonged to them

Supreme Court
The Supreme Court had on Tuesday started day-to-day hearing in the fourteen cases related to Ayodhya land title dispute
Aashish Aryan New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Aug 07 2019 | 8:18 PM IST
The faith of believers is evidence enough that the disputed land in Ayodhya was the birthplace of Lord Ram, the counsel for the deity ‘Ram Lalla’ told the Supreme Court on Wednesday. The response came on a question by the five-judge Constitution bench which wanted to know if the parties had any revenue records to show that the land or the disputed property belonged to them.

“How can we prove after so many centuries that Lord Ram took birth at the place?” senior advocate K Prasaran, appearing for deity 'Ram Lalla', told the Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi.

Pleading that the Valmiki Ramayana had mentioned Ayodhya as the birth place of Lord Ram three times, Prasaran said that the Ram Janmabhoomi had itself become personification of the deity and thus an object of worship for the Hindus.

The court also sought to know from him if there were any similar cases or precedents where the question of birth of a religious figure had ever arisen in any court of law.

“Whether issues like birth of Jesus Christ at Bethlehem have been questioned and dealt with by any court in the world," the bench asked the senior counsel, who said he would check and let the court know.

The Supreme Court had on Tuesday started day-to-day hearing in the fourteen cases related to Ayodhya land title dispute after a court-appointed panel, led by (Retired) Judge Justice F M I Kalifulla, failed to find a solution through mediation. A five-judge Constitution bench led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi is hearing the various parties who have laid claims to various parts of the entire disputed structure.

The fourteen cases also include a challenge to a 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment which had ruled that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya should be partitioned equally among Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and the deity Ram Lalla. The hearings are scheduled to continue on Thursday.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Supreme CourtBabri MasjidAyodhya caseRam Janmabhoomi dispute

Next Story