In the chargesheet filed before judge O.P. Saini, the ED named the Maran brothers, Kalanithi Maran’s wife, Kavery, and three others, including two companies, as accused. The court will consider the chargesheet on January 18. It asked the agency to place before it the entire set of relevant documents.
“The investigation... revealed that proceeds of crime worth Rs 742.58 crore were paid by companies based in Mauritius for Dayanidhi Maran, in the two companies, namely, Sun Direct TV Pvt Ltd (SDTPL) and South Asia FM Ltd (SAFL),” stated the ED on Friday.
On April 1 last year, the ED had attached Rs 742 crore of assets held by the brothers and Kavery. Their investigation is based on the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) report that Dayanidhi got 'illegal gratification' for the said sum from Maxis, a Malay telecom company. In August 2014, the CBI had charged the brothers, Malaysian business tycoon T Ananda Krishnan, Malaysian national Augustus Ralph Marshall, and four companies — Sun Direct TV, Maxis Communication Berhad, South Asia Entertainment Holding and Astro All Asia Network — in the case.
The attached assets include Rs 100 crore of fixed deposits held by Kalanithi Maran, freehold land and buildings owned by the Sun Network worth Rs 266 crore and fixed deposits worth Rs 7.47 crore held by Dayanidhi Maran.
ED is still investigating the involvement of foreign persons and others. “As and when this investigation is complete...supplementary complaint(s) shall be filed,” it said.
Earlier, CBI had told the court that Dayanidhi had “pressured” and “forced” Chennai-based telecom promoter C Sivasankaran to sell his stakes in Aircel and two subsidiary firms to Maxis Group in 2006. ED alleged the ex-telecom minister obtained the proceeds worth Rs 742.6 crore through companies of his relatives, camouflaging those as capital contribution in SDTPL and SAFL.
SDTPL is owned and controlled by Kalanithi Maran and Kavery Kalanithi. They are on its supervisory board as chairman and director, respectively.
Further investigation, relating to Foreign Investment Promotion Board approval to the Aircel–Maxis deal and related issues are the subject of further investigation. The aspects include receipt and transfer of funds in and outside India from Aircel Televentures and Maxis, directly and indirectly to the suspected Indian entities. In this regard, the trial court had issued letters of request on December 1, 2015, under Section 57 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, to courts in Singapore and Britain for investigation.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)