Maggi case: FSSAI moves apex court

A vendor works at a roadside Maggi noodles eatery in Ahmedabad
A vendor works at a roadside Maggi noodles eatery in Ahmedabad
Arnab DuttaNivedita MookerjiSanjay Jog New Delhi/Mumbai
Last Updated : Nov 17 2015 | 2:05 AM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

In less than a week of Nestlé’s Maggi noodles returning to the market, the country’s apex food regulator — Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) — has moved the Supreme Court in the matter.

Even as reports through Monday evening indicated that FSSAI had moved the SC against the Bombay High Court order that had allowed relaunch of the noodles and that it had questioned the credibility of the latest tests as samples were drawn from Nestlé, sources in the government told Business Standard the food regulator’s move might not have been directly linked to re-introduction of the product in the market.

Read more from our special coverage on "NESTLE MAGGI CONTROVERSY"



Nestlé India said, “It has been brought to our attention that the Hon’ble Supreme Court website has posted that FSSAI has filed a case against Nestlé India Ltd and others. We have not been served a notice about this and are not yet aware of its content. However, we would like to reiterate that Nestlé India is confident of the quality and safety of Maggi Noodles and so we will defend ourselves vigorously.”

These sources said FSSAI had approached the apex court on two issues — to appeal that some “adverse remarks” against officials of the regulatory body during the Maggi proceedings in the Bombay High Court be expunged, and not to de-accredit certain laboratories that had tested Maggi noodles as indicated by the court.

However, the reason for FSSAI moving the Supreme Court could not be independently verified with the food regulator or its lawyer. Calls made to FSSAI Chairman Ashish Bahuguna remained unanswered. FSSAI lawyer Mehmood Pracha did not respond to calls or text messages.

Officials in the Maharashtra Food & Drug Administration (FDA) told this newspaper they had not been consulted by FSSAI in moving the Supreme Court. They said had FSSAI sought return of the ban on Maggi noodles, Maharashtra FDA would have been taken on board.

Maharashtra FDA wanted the ban to continue and its draft petition is ready, a source said. It has to be vetted by the advocate general and then attorney general before it is taken forward. In June, the instant snack was banned across the country on the basis of some tested samples showing presence of monosodium glutamate and excessive lead content. FSSAI had termed Maggi noodles “hazardous to health” and had ordered pan-India recall of the product, stopping its manufacturing as well.

Although FSSAI comes  under the ambit of the health ministry in the Union government, the Centre was seen distancing itself from the controversial decision of banning the Swiss major’s popular snack in India. In fact, Yudhvir Malik, then chief executive officer of FSSAI, who was at the centre of decision-making against Maggi, was shifted out to Niti Aayog following protests within the food industry. Bahuguna, a former secretary in the agriculture ministry, was brought in as FSSAI chairman, a slot vacant for several months.

In such a backdrop, it is unlikely FSSAI would take a call to clamp on a multinational such as Nestlé at this point, a government official said. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is on a visit to the UK and Turkey, and wooing international companies to invest in India has been top of his agenda. Also, recently the government had come out with revised conditions for foreign investment in India, to make things simpler for international companies.            

On August 13, a bench of the Bombay High Court comprising Judges V M Kanade and B P Colabawalla had quashed the ‘order of recall’ on Maggi noodles, imposed by FSSAI on June 5. It also laid down the process of testing and specified three NABL-accredited and FSSAI approved laboratories to determine whether Maggi is fit for human consumption. Maggi cleared the first set of tests on October 16 which allowed Nestlé India to start manufacturing the product. A second set of tests, done afterwards on newly manufactured batches of the instant noodle, too declared the products safe.

REMARKS AGAINST FSSAI BY BOMBAY HC DIVISION BENCH
  • “In fact, the entire sequence culminating in imposition of ban on June 5, 2015 by respondent no.2 (FSSAI CEO) shows that there is something more that what meets the eye….”
     
  • “It appears that respondent no. 2 is also influenced by extraneous considerations such as the material, which has been placed before us  which is not reflected in the reasons given in the impugned order.”

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 17 2015 | 12:49 AM IST

Next Story