Govt knew of NSEL scam more than a year ago

April 2012 notice said data obtained by FMC indicated exchange didn't seek stocks from borrowers

Malini Bhupta Mumbai
Last Updated : Oct 04 2013 | 2:10 AM IST
Other than investors/lenders, everyone, including the management of National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL), the Forwards Markets Commission (FMC) and the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, knew, since long, there was no physical stock of any commodity against which money was being borrowed on the exchange.

A copy of a show-cause notice by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs to the NSEL chief executive in April 2012 said, “NSEL has not made it mandatory for the seller to actually deposit goods in the warehouse before taking a short-position through a member of the exchange. The exchange system has no stock check facility that validates the member’s position. The exchange allows trading on the exchange platform without verifying whether the seller member has the stocks with him or not. In this way, the exchange has violated conditions stipulated that no short-sale for the members of the exchange shall be allowed.”

The notice added the FMC had found of the total contracts, 55 offered for trade by NSEL had settlement periods exceeding 11 days and that NSEL was never granted any exemption on non-transferable delivery-based contracts. “Therefore, all contracts traded on NSEL with settlement period exceeding 11 days are a violation of the provisions of the FC(R) Act.”

It also questioned why action shouldn’t be taken against the exchange within 15 days of the receipt of the letter.

When contacted, an NSEL spokesperson said, “NSEL had replied to the ministry’s show-cause notice in details at that time. But instructions from the government came only in July 2013 for stopping the launch of new contracts and, subsequently, for squaring off open position for all contracts.”

Observers said this meant the government and the exchange already knew physical stocks were never mandated form borrowers/sellers, but this wasn’t conveyed to the lenders or buyers of contracts.

A broker who is part of the investor forum fighting the NSEL says, “The show-cause suggests the government and the exchange knew there was no stock, though the broking community did not know this. Also, if the government knew of this, why was action taken only in August 2013?”
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 04 2013 | 12:32 AM IST

Next Story